↓ Skip to main content

Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004375.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim Jamison, Suzanne Maguire, John McCann

Abstract

Management of the neurogenic bladder has the primary objectives of maintaining continence, ensuring low bladder pressure (to avoid renal damage) and avoiding or minimising infection. Options include intermittent urethral catheterisation, indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheterisation, timed voiding, use of external catheter (for men), drug treatment, augmentation cystoplasty and urinary diversion.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Engineering 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 16 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#941,408
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,847
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,447
of 240,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.