↓ Skip to main content

Point-and-Shoot Memories

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 3,856)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
89 news outlets
blogs
25 blogs
twitter
260 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Point-and-Shoot Memories
Published in
Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), December 2013
DOI 10.1177/0956797613504438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda A. Henkel

Abstract

Two studies examined whether photographing objects impacts what is remembered about them. Participants were led on a guided tour of an art museum and were directed to observe some objects and to photograph others. Results showed a photo-taking-impairment effect: If participants took a photo of each object as a whole, they remembered fewer objects and remembered fewer details about the objects and the objects' locations in the museum than if they instead only observed the objects and did not photograph them. However, when participants zoomed in to photograph a specific part of the object, their subsequent recognition and detail memory was not impaired, and, in fact, memory for features that were not zoomed in on was just as strong as memory for features that were zoomed in on. This finding highlights key differences between people's memory and the camera's "memory" and suggests that the additional attentional and cognitive processes engaged by this focused activity can eliminate the photo-taking-impairment effect.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 4%
United Kingdom 7 2%
Japan 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 303 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 21%
Student > Bachelor 55 16%
Student > Master 53 16%
Researcher 36 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 6%
Other 80 24%
Unknown 23 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 154 45%
Social Sciences 39 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 6%
Arts and Humanities 17 5%
Computer Science 16 5%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 38 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,008
of 17,144,747 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)
#14
of 3,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48
of 271,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)
#1
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,144,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.