You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Point-and-Shoot Memories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Science, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0956797613504438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda A. Henkel |
| Abstract |
Two studies examined whether photographing objects impacts what is remembered about them. Participants were led on a guided tour of an art museum and were directed to observe some objects and to photograph others. Results showed a photo-taking-impairment effect: If participants took a photo of each object as a whole, they remembered fewer objects and remembered fewer details about the objects and the objects' locations in the museum than if they instead only observed the objects and did not photograph them. However, when participants zoomed in to photograph a specific part of the object, their subsequent recognition and detail memory was not impaired, and, in fact, memory for features that were not zoomed in on was just as strong as memory for features that were zoomed in on. This finding highlights key differences between people's memory and the camera's "memory" and suggests that the additional attentional and cognitive processes engaged by this focused activity can eliminate the photo-taking-impairment effect. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 407 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 66 | 16% |
| United States | 43 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 4% |
| Japan | 14 | 3% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Thailand | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 6 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Unknown | 193 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 356 | 87% |
| Scientists | 34 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 376 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
| Researcher | 41 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 172 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 45 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 75 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1610. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,987
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#13
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 322,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#1
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.