Report for: Point-and-Shoot Memories

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Title	Point-and-Shoot Memories
Published in	Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), December 2013
DOI	10.1177/0956797613504438
Pubmed ID	24311477
Authors	Linda A. Henkel
Abstract	Two studies examined whether photographing objects impacts what is remembered about them. Participants were led on a guided tour of an art museum and were directed to observe some objects and to photograph others. Results showed a photo-taking-impairment effect: If participants took a photo of each object as a whole, they remembered fewer objects and remembered fewer details about the objects and the objects' locations in the museum than if they instead only observed the objects and did not photograph them. However, when participants zoomed in to photograph a specific part of the object, their subsequent recognition and detail memory was not impaired, and, in fact, memory for features that were not zoomed in on was just as strong as memory for features that were zoomed in on. This finding highlights key differences between people's memory and the camera's "memory" and suggests that the additional attentional and cognitive processes engaged by this focused activity can eliminate the photo-taking-impairment effect.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 266 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	64	24%
United Kingdom	22	8%
Canada	12	5%
Thailand	9	3%
Australia	7	3%
Netherlands	6	2%
Japan	6	2%
France	6	2%
Italy	5	2%
Other	30	11%
Unknown	99	37%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	218	82%
Scientists	34	13%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	10	4%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	4	2%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	12	4%
United Kingdom	7	2%
Japan	4	1%
Germany	3	<1%
Sweden	2	<1%
Netherlands	1	<1%
France	1	<1%
South Africa	1	<1%
Austria	1	<1%
Other	5	2%
Unknown	284	88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	68	21%
Student > Bachelor	51	16%
Student > Master	50	16%
Researcher	36	11%
Professor > Associate Professor	20	6%
Other	78	24%
Unknown	18	6%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Psychology	149	46%
Social Sciences	36	11%
Business, Management and Accounting	18	6%
Arts and Humanities	17	5%
Computer Science	16	5%
Other	54	17%
Unknown	31	10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.

All research outputs

#5,024

of 15,884,675 outputs

Outputs from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)

#12

of 3,777 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#48

of 264,754 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)

of 94 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 15,884,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.

Point-and-Shoot Memories

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context