Report for: Point-and-Shoot Memories

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Title	Point-and-Shoot Memories
Published in	Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), December 2013
DOI	10.1177/0956797613504438
Pubmed ID	24311477
Authors	Linda A. Henkel
Abstract	Two studies examined whether photographing objects impacts what is remembered about them. Participants were led on a guided tour of an art museum and were directed to observe some objects and to photograph others. Results showed a photo-taking-impairment effect: If participants took a photo of each object as a whole, they remembered fewer objects and remembered fewer details about the objects and the objects' locations in the museum than if they instead only observed the objects and did not photograph them. However, when participants zoomed in to photograph a specific part of the object, their subsequent recognition and detail memory was not impaired, and, in fact, memory for features that were not zoomed in on was just as strong as memory for features that were zoomed in on. This finding highlights key differences between people's memory and the camera's "memory" and suggests that the additional attentional and cognitive processes engaged by this focused activity can eliminate the photo-taking-impairment effect.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	69	25%
United Kingdom	22	8%
Canada	13	5%
Thailand	9	3%
Australia	7	3%
Japan	7	3%
Netherlands	6	2%
France	6	2%
Italy	5	2%
Other	28	10%
Unknown	99	37%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	218	80%
Scientists	38	14%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	11	4%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	4	1%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	12	4%
United Kingdom	7	2%
Japan	4	1%
Germany	3	<1%
Sweden	2	<1%
Netherlands	1	<1%
France	1	<1%
South Africa	1	<1%
Austria	1	<1%
Other	5	2%
Unknown	271	88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	67	22%
Student > Bachelor	52	17%
Student > Master	50	16%
Researcher	31	10%
Professor > Associate Professor	20	6%
Other	72	23%
Unknown	16	5%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Psychology	144	47%
Social Sciences	33	11%
Business, Management and Accounting	18	6%
Arts and Humanities	18	6%
Computer Science	16	5%
Other	51	17%
Unknown	28	9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.

All research outputs

#3,714

of 14,566,946 outputs

Outputs from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)

#11

of 3,673 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#46

of 253,760 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)

of 94 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 14,566,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.

Point-and-Shoot Memories

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context