↓ Skip to main content

Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008783.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheena Derry, Roy Rabbie, R Andrew Moore

Abstract

This review is an update of a previously published review in Issue 2, 2012 (Derry 2012a). Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers choose not to, or are unable to, seek professional help and rely on over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics. Diclofenac is an established analgesic, and new formulations using the potassium or epolamine salts, which can be dissolved in water, have been developed for rapid absorption, which may be beneficial in acute migraine. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce the nausea and vomiting commonly associated with migraine.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Other 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 25 35%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 50%
Unspecified 8 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Psychology 6 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2018.
All research outputs
#938,708
of 12,552,783 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,101
of 10,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,450
of 242,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,552,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.