You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A universal genome sequencing method for rotavirus A from human fecal samples which identifies segment reassortment and multi-genotype mixed infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12864-017-3714-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tran Thi Ngoc Dung, Pham Thanh Duy, October M. Sessions, Uma K. Sangumathi, Voong Vinh Phat, Pham Thi Thanh Tam, Nguyen Thi Nguyen To, Tran My Phuc, Tran Thi Hong Chau, Nguyen Ngoc Minh Chau, Ngoc Nguyen Minh, Guy E. Thwaites, Maia A. Rabaa, Stephen Baker |
| Abstract |
Genomic characterization of rotavirus (RoV) has not been adopted at large-scale due to the complexity of obtaining sequences for all 11 segments, particularly when feces are used as starting material. To overcome these limitations, we developed a novel RoV capture and genome sequencing method combining commercial enzyme immunoassay plates and a set of routinely used reagents. Our approach had a 100% success rate, producing >90% genome coverage for diverse RoV present in fecal samples (Ct < 30). This method provides a novel, reproducible and comparatively simple approach for genomic RoV characterization and could be scaled-up for use in global RoV surveillance systems. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN88101063 . Date of registration: 14/06/2012. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,890,248
of 25,252,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,460
of 11,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,952
of 315,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#81
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,252,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.