↓ Skip to main content

Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 6,567)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2961 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2632 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, April 2017
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul McCrory, Willem Meeuwisse, Jiří Dvořák, Mark Aubry, Julian Bailes, Steven Broglio, Robert C Cantu, David Cassidy, Ruben J Echemendia, Rudy J Castellani, Gavin A Davis, Richard Ellenbogen, Carolyn Emery, Lars Engebretsen, Nina Feddermann-Demont, Christopher C Giza, Kevin M Guskiewicz, Stanley Herring, Grant L Iverson, Karen M Johnston, James Kissick, Jeffrey Kutcher, John J Leddy, David Maddocks, Michael Makdissi, Geoff T Manley, Michael McCrea, William P Meehan, Shinji Nagahiro, Jon Patricios, Margot Putukian, Kathryn J Schneider, Allen Sills, Charles H Tator, Michael Turner, Pieter E Vos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,558 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,632 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 2623 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 456 17%
Student > Master 426 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 213 8%
Other 205 8%
Researcher 171 6%
Other 489 19%
Unknown 672 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 549 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 336 13%
Sports and Recreations 336 13%
Neuroscience 205 8%
Psychology 147 6%
Other 287 11%
Unknown 772 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,029
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#10
of 6,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 324,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.