You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Assessing Distribution and Variation of Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Using Short-Read Sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Plant Genomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7003-2_5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7001-8, 978-1-4939-7003-2
|
| Authors |
Hagmann, Jörg, Becker, Claude, Jörg Hagmann, Claude Becker |
| Editors |
Wolfgang Busch |
| Abstract |
DNA methylation is one of the most prominent epigenetic marks and is particularly complex in plant genomes. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) using short reads has become the standard tool to study genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation. The goal of the present protocol is to enable readers to perform WGBS on both the wet lab and the computational side. We briefly outline important steps in bisulfite library preparation, then focus on the different aspects of DNA methylation analysis, from read mapping to identifying biologically relevant differential methylation between different samples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 55% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,542,806
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,935
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,192
of 309,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#170
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.