You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Providing safe motherhood services to underserved and neglected populations in Yemen: the case for vouchers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-017-0021-4 |
| Authors |
Corinne G. Grainger, Anna C. Gorter, Eman Al-Kobati, Luke Boddam-Whetham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,622,932
of 23,646,998 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#34
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,687
of 310,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,646,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them