↓ Skip to main content

Betanodavirus: Dissection of the viral life cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish Diseases, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Betanodavirus: Dissection of the viral life cycle
Published in
Journal of Fish Diseases, April 2017
DOI 10.1111/jfd.12638
Pubmed ID
Authors

C‐F Low, B Syarul Nataqain, H‐Y Chee, M Z H Rozaini, M Najiah

Abstract

Progressive research has been recently made in dissecting the molecular biology of Betanodavirus life cycle, the causative pathogen of viral encephalopathy and retinopathy in economic important marine fish species. Establishment of betanodavirus infectious clone allows the manipulation of virus genome for functional genomic study, which elucidates the biological event of the viral life cycle at molecular level. The betanodavirus strategizes its replication by expressing anti-apoptosis/antinecrotic proteins to maintain the cell viability during early infection. Subsequently utilizes and controls the biological machinery of the infected cells for viral genome replication. Towards the late phase of infection, mass production of capsid protein for virion assembly induces the activation of host apoptosis pathway. It eventually leads to the cell lysis and death, which the lysis of cell contributes to the accomplishment of viral shedding that completes a viral life cycle. The recent efforts to dissect the entire betanodavirus life cycle are currently reviewed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 7%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 26 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2017.
All research outputs
#21,921,572
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Diseases
#1,340
of 1,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,245
of 314,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Diseases
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,574 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.