↓ Skip to main content

Qualidade de vida no Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo: um estudo com usuários da Atenção Básica

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualidade de vida no Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo: um estudo com usuários da Atenção Básica
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017224.02062015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Coelho Scholl, Viviane Porto Tabeleão, Rafaelle Stark Stigger, Jéssica Puchalski Trettim, Mariana Bonati de Mattos, Andressa Jacondino Pires, Mariane Acosta Lopez Molina, Ricardo Azevedo da Silva, Elaine Tomasi, Luciana de Avila Quevedo

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) can be affected by the presence of mental disorders, like Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Thus, the evaluation and monitoring of QOL in patients with mental disorders enables the identification of priorities, making it possible to implement actions to improve QOL among health system users. The scope of this article is to measure QOL in OCD patients in primary health care. It involves a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample including all users of three Basic Health Units of Pelotas in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The quality of life was measured with the WHOQOL-Bref and the OCD was assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) This study included 1081 individuals. The prevalence of OCD was 3.9%. OCD patients had a lower average in all domains of QOL when compared to individuals without OCD (p < 0.001). The findings of this study emphasize the importance of using QOL as a monitoring tool of the disorder in basic health care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 39%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2017.
All research outputs
#10,030,594
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#449
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,132
of 259,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.