You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-017-0631-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Ryder, R. M. Leadley, N. Armstrong, M. Westwood, S. de Kock, T. Butt, M. Jain, J. Kleijnen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 761 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 761 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 143 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 10% |
| Researcher | 56 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 6% |
| Other | 117 | 15% |
| Unknown | 248 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 96 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 4% |
| Other | 122 | 16% |
| Unknown | 268 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,275,051
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#134
of 3,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,590
of 326,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.