↓ Skip to main content

Delayed diagnosis of sarcoidosis is common in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delayed diagnosis of sarcoidosis is common in Brazil
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, September 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132013000500003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauri Monteiro Rodrigues, Ester Nei Aparecida Martins Coletta, Rimarcs Gomes Ferreira, Carlos Alberto de Castro Pereira

Abstract

To determine the frequency of and the factors related to delayed diagnosis of sarcoidosis in Brazil.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,640,348
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
#246
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,893
of 200,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.