↓ Skip to main content

Delayed diagnosis of sarcoidosis is common in Brazil*

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delayed diagnosis of sarcoidosis is common in Brazil*
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132013000500003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauri Monteiro Rodrigues, Ester Nei Aparecida Martins Coletta, Rimarcs Gomes Ferreira, Carlos Alberto de Castro Pereira

Abstract

To determine the frequency of and the factors related to delayed diagnosis of sarcoidosis in Brazil.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,640,730
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#288
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,358
of 289,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#29
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.