↓ Skip to main content

Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002128.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Rees, Mariana Dyakova, Nicola Wilson, Kirsten Ward, Margaret Thorogood, Eric Brunner, Rees K, Dyakova M, Wilson N, Ward K, Thorogood M, Brunner E

Abstract

Changes in population diet are likely to reduce cardiovascular disease and cancer, but the effect of dietary advice is uncertain. This review is an update of a previous review published in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Other 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 53%
Psychology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,073,657
of 8,348,788 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,582
of 8,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,799
of 181,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,348,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.