You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brain-computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
An H Do, Po T Wang, Christine E King, Sophia N Chun, Zoran Nenadic |
| Abstract |
Excessive reliance on wheelchairs in individuals with tetraplegia or paraplegia due to spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to many medical co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic derangements, osteoporosis, and pressure ulcers. Treatment of these conditions contributes to the majority of SCI health care costs. Restoring able-body-like ambulation in this patient population can potentially reduce the incidence of these medical co-morbidities, in addition to increasing independence and quality of life. However, no biomedical solution exists that can reverse this loss of neurological function, and hence novel methods are needed. Brain-computer interface (BCI) controlled lower extremity prostheses may constitute one such novel approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 342 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 18% |
| Researcher | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 75 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 106 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 88 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,389,289
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#100
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,369
of 320,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.