Menstrual and fertility outcomes following the surgical management of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Menstrual and fertility outcomes following the surgical management of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doumouchtsis S, Nikolopoulos K, Talaulikar V, Krishna A, Arulkumaran S, Doumouchtsis, SK, Nikolopoulos, K, Talaulikar, VS, Krishna, A, Arulkumaran, S

Abstract

Uterine-sparing surgical interventions have long been practiced as an alternative to hysterectomy in the management of severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH); however, the risks of impairment of subsequent fertility from such procedures are unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
France 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 75%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#1,189,905
of 6,302,768 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#407
of 1,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,189
of 146,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,302,768 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.