↓ Skip to main content

Optimum duration of regimens forHelicobacter pylorieradication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
82 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimum duration of regimens forHelicobacter pylorieradication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008337.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuhong Yuan, Alex C Ford, Khurram J Khan, Javier P Gisbert, David Forman, Grigorios I Leontiadis, Frances Tse, Xavier Calvet, Carlo Fallone, Lori Fischbach, Giuseppina Oderda, Franco Bazzoli, Paul Moayyedi

Abstract

The optimal duration for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy is controversial, with recommendations ranging from 7 to 14 days. Several systematic reviews have attempted to address this issue but have given conflicting results and limited their analysis to proton pump inhibitor (PPI), two antibiotics (PPI triple) therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the optimal duration of multiple H. pylori eradication regimens.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Student > Master 29 16%
Unspecified 24 14%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 57 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 53%
Unspecified 33 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 28 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#268,826
of 13,645,026 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#690
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,776
of 252,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,645,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.