↓ Skip to main content

Does perception equal reality? Weight misperception in relation to weight-related attitudes and behaviors among overweight and obese US adults

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does perception equal reality? Weight misperception in relation to weight-related attitudes and behaviors among overweight and obese US adults
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dustin T Duncan, Kathleen Y Wolin, Melissa Scharoun-Lee, Eric L Ding, Erica T Warner, Gary G Bennett

Abstract

Weight misperception might preclude the adoption of healthful weight-related attitudes and behaviors among overweight and obese individuals, yet limited research exists in this area. We examined associations between weight misperception and several weight-related attitudes and behaviors among a nationally representative sample of overweight and obese US adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 281 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 14%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 57 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 12%
Psychology 34 12%
Social Sciences 31 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 74 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,363,934
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#897
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,611
of 108,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.