↓ Skip to main content

Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular extraction: governmental costs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular extraction: governmental costs
Published in
Clinics, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322010000400002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Newton Kara-Junior, Maysa Godoy Gomes Mazurek Sirtoli, Marcony Rodrigues Santhiago, Tais Renata Ribeira Parede, Rodrigo França de Espíndola, Regina de Souza Carvalho

Abstract

To evaluate the governmental costs of patients undergoing phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction at a public hospital in a developing country.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 9%
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 59%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#11,273,934
of 17,413,731 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#322
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,639
of 272,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,413,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.