↓ Skip to main content

Revisão sistemática sobre nível de atividade física e estado nutricional de crianças brasileiras

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Salud Pública, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 127)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisão sistemática sobre nível de atividade física e estado nutricional de crianças brasileiras
Published in
Revista de Salud Pública, October 2016
DOI 10.15446/rsap.v18n4.42351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisele Graziele Bento, Franciele Cascaes Silva, Elizandra Gonçalves, Patrícia Domingos Santos, Rudney Silva

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the literature on the prevalence and the factors associated with physical activity level and nutritional status of Brazilian children. Methods The electronic database MEDLINE (via PubMed), SciELO, SCOPUS and Web of Science were selected. The search strategy included the descriptors proposed in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): "Motor Activity", "Activities", "Nutritional Status", "Overweight", "Obesity", "Body Mass Index", "Child", "Brazil". Results The search allowed the identification of 141 articles, of which 16 studies were considered potentially relevant and were included in the review. Conclusions Studies about nutritional status and physical activity levels in Brazilian children are still scarce, but the work on this has increased in recent years, especially those that use cross designs, as well as questionnaires to measure physical activity; BMI for nutritional status is still widely used. Furthermore, studies that analyzed the amount of hours designated to sedentary behaviors such as watching TV, playing video-games and using the computer, found that these activities took more than two hours every day.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 9 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#9,155,276
of 14,574,779 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Salud Pública
#32
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,086
of 264,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Salud Pública
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,574,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.