You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide analyses implicate 33 loci in heritable dog osteosarcoma, including regulatory variants near CDKN2A/B
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elinor K Karlsson, Snaevar Sigurdsson, Emma Ivansson, Rachael Thomas, Ingegerd Elvers, Jason Wright, Cedric Howald, Noriko Tonomura, Michele Perloski, Ross Swofford, Tara Biagi, Sarah Fryc, Nathan Anderson, Celine Courtay-Cahen, Lisa Youell, Sally L Ricketts, Sarah Mandlebaum, Patricio Rivera, Henrik von Euler, William C Kisseberth, Cheryl A London, Eric S Lander, Guillermo Couto, Kenine Comstock, Mike P Starkey, Jaime F Modiano, Matthew Breen, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh |
| Abstract |
Canine osteosarcoma is clinically nearly identical to the human disease, but is common and highly heritable, making genetic dissection feasible. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 38% |
| United States | 8 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Iceland | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Nepal | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 24 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#749,674
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#482
of 4,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,625
of 321,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#9
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.