↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised patients

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised patients
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005563.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siddiqi, Najma, Holt, Rachel, Britton, Annette M, Holmes, John

Abstract

Delirium is a common mental disorder with serious adverse outcomes in hospitalised patients. It is associated with increases in mortality, physical morbidity, length of hospital stay, institutionalisation and costs to healthcare providers. A range of risk factors has been implicated in its aetiology, including aspects of the routine care and environment in hospitals. Prevention of delirium is clearly desirable from patients' and carers' perspectives, and to reduce hospital costs. Yet it is currently unclear whether interventions for prevention of delirium are effective, whether they can be successfully delivered in all environments, and whether different interventions are necessary for different groups of patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 214 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 63 27%
Unknown 20 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Psychology 16 7%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 23 10%