↓ Skip to main content

Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003195.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiran David Clement, Marie Carmela M Lapitan, Muhammad Imran Omar, Cathryn MA Glazener

Abstract

Urodynamic tests are used to investigate people who have urinary incontinence or other urinary symptoms in order to make a definitive, objective diagnosis. The aim is to help select the treatment most likely to be successful. The investigations are invasive and time consuming.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 22 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,788,894
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,228
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,705
of 241,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.