You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1246981 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Wang, Jenny J. Wei, David M. Sabatini, Eric S. Lander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 50% |
| Scientists | 16 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | <1% |
| Germany | 12 | <1% |
| Canada | 12 | <1% |
| China | 10 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| Italy | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 46 | 1% |
| Unknown | 4268 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1091 | 25% |
| Researcher | 875 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 559 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 489 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 185 | 4% |
| Other | 592 | 13% |
| Unknown | 644 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1663 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1282 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 245 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 120 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 70 | 2% |
| Other | 341 | 8% |
| Unknown | 714 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#274,874
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Science
#7,492
of 83,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,421
of 322,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#73
of 838 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 838 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.