You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy Turner, Isabelle Boutron, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Douglas G Altman, David Moher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 30% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,471,278
of 23,485,953 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#230
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,849
of 204,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.