↓ Skip to main content

Discovery of 505-million-year old chitin in the basal demosponge Vauxia gracilenta

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovery of 505-million-year old chitin in the basal demosponge Vauxia gracilenta
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep03497
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Ehrlich, J. Keith Rigby, J. P. Botting, M. V. Tsurkan, C. Werner, P. Schwille, Z. Petrášek, A. Pisera, P. Simon, V. N. Sivkov, D. V. Vyalikh, S. L. Molodtsov, D. Kurek, M. Kammer, S. Hunoldt, R. Born, D. Stawski, A. Steinhof, V. V. Bazhenov, T. Geisler

Abstract

Sponges are probably the earliest branching animals, and their fossil record dates back to the Precambrian. Identifying their skeletal structure and composition is thus a crucial step in improving our understanding of the early evolution of metazoans. Here, we present the discovery of 505-million-year-old chitin, found in exceptionally well preserved Vauxia gracilenta sponges from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Our new findings indicate that, given the right fossilization conditions, chitin is stable for much longer than previously suspected. The preservation of chitin in these fossils opens new avenues for research into other ancient fossil groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 116 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 18%
Chemistry 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,959,732
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#17,988
of 142,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,295
of 322,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#86
of 670 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 670 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.