You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms15174 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Wei, Qingjie Ge, Ruwei Yao, Zhiyong Wen, Chuanyan Fang, Lisheng Guo, Hengyong Xu, Jian Sun |
| Abstract |
The direct production of liquid fuels from CO2 hydrogenation has attracted enormous interest for its significant roles in mitigating CO2 emissions and reducing dependence on petrochemicals. Here we report a highly efficient, stable and multifunctional Na-Fe3O4/HZSM-5 catalyst, which can directly convert CO2 to gasoline-range (C5-C11) hydrocarbons with selectivity up to 78% of all hydrocarbons while only 4% methane at a CO2 conversion of 22% under industrial relevant conditions. It is achieved by a multifunctional catalyst providing three types of active sites (Fe3O4, Fe5C2 and acid sites), which cooperatively catalyse a tandem reaction. More significantly, the appropriate proximity of three types of active sites plays a crucial role in the successive and synergetic catalytic conversion of CO2 to gasoline. The multifunctional catalyst, exhibiting a remarkable stability for 1,000 h on stream, definitely has the potential to be a promising industrial catalyst for CO2 utilization to liquid fuels. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Iceland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 81% |
| Scientists | 11 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 918 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 915 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 219 | 24% |
| Researcher | 142 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 105 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 5% |
| Other | 98 | 11% |
| Unknown | 229 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 236 | 26% |
| Chemical Engineering | 148 | 16% |
| Engineering | 88 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 37 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 104 | 11% |
| Unknown | 285 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#178,379
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,534
of 57,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,740
of 325,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#60
of 1,024 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,024 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.