You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do people with dementia die at their preferred location of death? A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Age & Ageing, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1093/ageing/aft151 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vellingiri Badrakalimuthu, Stephen Barclay |
Abstract |
place of death is an important component of the quality of a person's death. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature concerning place of death of people with dementia and the preferences for location of death of people with dementia as well as family carers and healthcare providers preferred location of death for patients with dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 29% |
Spain | 3 | 9% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
Scientists | 6 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 40 | 22% |
Researcher | 21 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Other | 38 | 21% |
Unknown | 37 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 10% |
Psychology | 12 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,146,148
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#467
of 3,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,212
of 228,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#13
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.