You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lake volume and groundwater storage variations in Tibetan Plateau's endorheic basin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2017gl073773 |
| Authors |
Guoqing Zhang, Tandong Yao, C. K. Shum, Shuang Yi, Kun Yang, Hongjie Xie, Wei Feng, Tobias Bolch, Lei Wang, Ali Behrangi, Hongbo Zhang, Weicai Wang, Yang Xiang, Jinyuan Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 41 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 17% |
| Engineering | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#620,748
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#1,354
of 19,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,586
of 317,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#50
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.