↓ Skip to main content

Wound drainage for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wound drainage for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004549.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Gates, Elizabeth R Anderson

Abstract

Subcutaneous and sub rectus sheath wound drains are sometimes used in women who have undergone caesarean section. The indications for using drains vary by clinician.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Other 14 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 20 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,885,866
of 15,038,142 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,727
of 11,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,867
of 260,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,038,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.