↓ Skip to main content

Wound drainage for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wound drainage for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004549.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Gates, Elizabeth R Anderson

Abstract

Subcutaneous and sub rectus sheath wound drains are sometimes used in women who have undergone caesarean section. The indications for using drains vary by clinician.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 10 12%
Unspecified 7 8%
Other 27 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 24%
Unspecified 13 16%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,403,305
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,878
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,922
of 242,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.