↓ Skip to main content

Changes in the hemagglutinin of H5N1 viruses during human infection – Influence on receptor binding

Overview of attention for article published in Virology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in the hemagglutinin of H5N1 viruses during human infection – Influence on receptor binding
Published in
Virology, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.virol.2013.08.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Crusat, Junfeng Liu, Angelina S. Palma, Robert A. Childs, Yan Liu, Stephen A. Wharton, Yi Pu Lin, Peter J. Coombs, Stephen R. Martin, Mikhail Matrosovich, Zi Chen, David J. Stevens, Vo Minh Hien, Tran Tan Thanh, Le Nguyen Truc Nhu, Lam Anh Nguyet, Do Quang Ha, H.Rogier van Doorn, Tran Tinh Hien, Harald S. Conradt, Makoto Kiso, Steve J. Gamblin, Wengang Chai, John J. Skehel, Alan J. Hay, Jeremy Farrar, Menno D. de Jong, Ten Feizi

Abstract

As avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses continue to circulate in Asia and Africa, global concerns of an imminent pandemic persist. Recent experimental studies suggest that efficient transmission between humans of current H5N1 viruses only requires a few genetic changes. An essential step is alteration of the virus hemagglutinin from preferential binding to avian receptors for the recognition of human receptors present in the upper airway. We have identified receptor-binding changes which emerged during H5N1 infection of humans, due to single amino acid substitutions, Ala134Val and Ile151Phe, in the hemagglutinin. Detailed biological, receptor-binding, and structural analyses revealed reduced binding of the mutated viruses to avian-like receptors, but without commensurate increased binding to the human-like receptors investigated, possibly reflecting a receptor-binding phenotype intermediate in adaptation to more human-like characteristics. These observations emphasize that evolution in nature of avian H5N1 viruses to efficient binding of human receptors is a complex multistep process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Virology
#8,046
of 9,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,277
of 213,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology
#41
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.