↓ Skip to main content

Apoptosis goes on a chip: advances in the microfluidic analysis of programmed cell death

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Chemistry, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Apoptosis goes on a chip: advances in the microfluidic analysis of programmed cell death
Published in
Analytical Chemistry, September 2011
DOI 10.1021/ac200588g
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald Wlodkowic, Khashayar Khoshmanesh, John C. Sharpe, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz, Jonathan M. Cooper

Abstract

Recent years have brought enormous progress in cell-based lab-on-a-chip technologies, allowing dynamic studies of cell death with an unprecedented accuracy. As interest in the microfabricated technologies for cell-based bioassays is rapidly gaining momentum, we highlight the most promising technologies that provide a new outlook for the rapid assessment of programmed and accidental cell death and are applicable in drug discovery, high-content drug screening, and personalized clinical diagnostics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
China 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 56 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 32%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 27%
Engineering 14 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 8 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2011.
All research outputs
#1,006,696
of 4,506,762 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Chemistry
#498
of 5,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,302
of 57,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Chemistry
#15
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,069 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.