↓ Skip to main content

Telerehabilitation services for stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telerehabilitation services for stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010255.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate E Laver, Daniel Schoene, Maria Crotty, Stacey George, Natasha A Lannin, Catherine Sherrington

Abstract

Telerehabilitation is an alternative way of delivering rehabilitation services. Information and communication technologies are used to facilitate communication between the healthcare professional and the patient in a remote location. The use of telerehabilitation is becoming more viable as the speed and sophistication of communication technologies improve. However, it is currently unclear how effective this model of delivery is relative to rehabilitation delivered face-to-face.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 377 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 16%
Researcher 57 15%
Unspecified 40 10%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Other 114 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 31%
Unspecified 57 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 14%
Psychology 34 9%
Engineering 25 6%
Other 102 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#974,924
of 13,635,031 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,974
of 10,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,758
of 253,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,635,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.