Complete versus culprit‐only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi‐vessel disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2017

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog
policy: 1 policy source

twitter: 52 X users
facebook: 2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation: 23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 181 Mendeley
citeulike: 1 CiteULike

Summary Blogs Policy documents X Facebook Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 55 X posts from 52 X users, with an upper bound of 382,119 followers.

RT @BrantMDJD: https://t.co/BaSEZST1pP You can see what the Cochrane "experts" did to throw out inconvenient studies all showing what COMP…

04 Sep 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

https://t.co/BaSEZST1pP You can see what the Cochrane "experts" did to throw out inconvenient studies all showing what COMPLETE showed. Cochrane admits complete revascularization appears to be better but says evidence poor. Long history of such studies ig

04 Sep 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @DLBHATTMD: Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation heart attack with multi-vessel disease https://t.co/ipDpDuxStT

24 Mar 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @DLBHATTMD: Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myo... https://t.co/4wuPlrmCCJ

16 Feb 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 51 additional X posts.