You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TNF-α and IL-10 modulation induced by polyphenols extracted by olive pomace in a mouse model of paw inflammation.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.4415/ann_15_04_21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentina Carito, Stefania Ciafrè, Luigi Tarani, Mauro Ceccanti, Fausta Natella, Angela Iannitelli, Paola Tirassa, George N Chaldakov, Marco Ceccanti, Chiara Boccardo, Marco Fiore |
| Abstract |
Polyphenols from olive are known to possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The aim of this study was to study whether or not 10 consecutive days i.p. administration of a blend of olive (Olea europaea L.) polyphenols (10 mg/kg) containing mostly hydroxytyrosol could have an effect on cytokines playing important roles in inflammatory processes as TNF-α and IL-10. Inflammation was induced in the mouse paw by 2 carrageenan injections (50 µl vol, 5 mg/kg each). TNF-α and IL-10 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Carrageenan decreased IL-10 in the paws, however, this reduction appeared to be less evident in mice treated with carrageenan but administered with polyphenols. As for TNF-α, our findings did not reveal differences between groups but an increase in the polyphenol and carrageenan group if compared to the carrageenan only group. As for antioxidant polyphenols' properties, no differences between groups in the serum glutathione were found. Altogether, this investigation shows that olive polyphenols in the mouse may modulate the levels of cytokines having a role in the process of inflammation as TNF-α and IL-10. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 1000% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 300% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 300% |
| Professor | 2 | 200% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 200% |
| Other | 8 | 800% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 700% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 600% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 400% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 300% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 200% |
| Other | 5 | 500% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,534,407
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#143
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,437
of 361,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.