You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aquatic Exercise for the Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Therapy, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ptj/pzx043 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcia R Franco, Priscilla K Morelhão, Augusto de Carvalho, Rafael Z Pinto |
| Abstract |
Highlights the findings and application of Cochrane reviews and other evidence pertinent to the practice of physical therapy. The Cochrane library is a respected source of reliable evidence related to health care. Cochrane systematic reviews explore the evidence for and against the effectiveness and appropriateness of interventions-medications, surgery, education, nutrition, exercise-and the evidence for and against the use of diagnostic tests for specific conditions. Cochrane reviews are designed to facilitate the decisions of clinicians, patients, and others in health care by providing a careful review and interpretation of research studies published in the scientific literature. Each article in this PTJ series summarizes a Cochrane review or other scientific evidence resource on a single topic and will present clinical scenarios based on real patients to illustrate how the results of the review can be used to directly inform clinical decisions. This article summarizes the results of the Cochrane review entitled "Aquatic exercise for the treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis" and presents a clinical scenario based on a real patient, to illustrate how the results of the systematic review can be directly applied in clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 316 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 97 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 109 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,272,827
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy
#1,342
of 2,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,763
of 324,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.