↓ Skip to main content

Dietary sodium manipulation and asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary sodium manipulation and asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000436.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zara Pogson, Tricia McKeever

Abstract

There is a wide geographical variation in the prevalence of asthma and observational studies have suggested that dietary sodium may play a role.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Librarian 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Unspecified 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#1,059,750
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,062
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,507
of 242,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.