You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Where can wolves live and how can we live with them?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.029 |
| Authors |
L. David Mech |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 57% |
| Scientists | 18 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 16% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 72 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 76 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Unknown | 82 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#554,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#442
of 6,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,339
of 334,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#12
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.