↓ Skip to main content

Anticholinergic medication for non‐clozapine neuroleptic‐induced hypersalivation in people with schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticholinergic medication for non‐clozapine neuroleptic‐induced hypersalivation in people with schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009546.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adib Essali, Anas Rihawi, Mohammad Altujjar, Bishr Alhafez, Amjad Tarboush, Nahla Alhaj Hasan

Abstract

Treatment of schizophrenia depends heavily on neuroleptic drugs. Hypersalivation is a common side effect when people with schizophrenia are treated with neuroleptic drugs. Hypersalivation can be an embarrassing and stigmatising problem, can affect quality of life and can result in discontinuation of neuroleptic treatment. It can also be difficult to treat.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Psychology 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 51 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,783,988
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,197
of 13,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,275
of 320,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.