↓ Skip to main content

Importancia del proceso en la evaluación de la efectividad de una intervención sobre obesidad infantil

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Importancia del proceso en la evaluación de la efectividad de una intervención sobre obesidad infantil
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.11.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Lineros-González, Jorge Marcos-Marcos, Carles Ariza, Mariano Hernán-García

Abstract

The prevention of childhood obesity is one of the greatest public health challenges of modern times. This has triggered the generation of a wealth of scientific evidence, culminating in a body of knowledge concerning the essential components of campaigns implemented in the school setting. In this regard, a growing trend towards the evaluation of research results in terms of effectiveness has become apparent, while the fieldwork itself very rarely comes under the spotlight. By considering the implementation process description of a multicomponent campaign designed to prevent childhood obesity in boys and girls in the 3(rd) year of primary education in Spain (9-10 years of age), the aim of this paper is to influence the elements of this process by considering important aspects pertaining to its implementation, such as its plausibility and feasibility in the particular context.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 37%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 19%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Psychology 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 34 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,040,042
of 15,967,758 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#282
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,700
of 268,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,967,758 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.