You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving Adherence Physical Activity with a Smartphone Application Based on Adults with Intellectual Disabilities (APPCOID)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1173 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Pérez-Cruzado, Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas |
| Abstract |
People with intellectual disabilities (ID) have lower levels of physical activity and quality of life and they have a lot of barriers to face when taking part in physical activity. Other problems are the poor adherence to physical activity such people have so this study is designed to improve adherence to physical activity for people with intellectual disabilities with the assistance of an application for smartphones. The aim of the study will be to improve physical activity and physical condition after multimodal intervention and to analyse the promotion of adherence to physical activity through a multimodal intervention and an app intervention (mHealth) in people with ID. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 305 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Researcher | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 75 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 12% |
| Psychology | 33 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Unknown | 85 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#13,398,398
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,499
of 14,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,963
of 307,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#167
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.