You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Horizontal gene transfer is not a hallmark of the human genome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-017-1214-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven L. Salzberg |
Abstract |
Crisp et al. recently reported that 145 human genes have been horizontally transferred from distant species. Here, I re-analyze those genes listed by Crisp et al. as having the highest certainty of having been horizontally transferred, as well as 17 further genes from the 2001 human genome article, and find little or no evidence to support claims of horizontal gene transfer (HGT).Please see related Research article: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-015-0607-3. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 32 | 31% |
United Kingdom | 11 | 11% |
Sweden | 5 | 5% |
Australia | 5 | 5% |
Germany | 4 | 4% |
France | 3 | 3% |
India | 2 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 52 | 50% |
Members of the public | 50 | 48% |
Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
Researcher | 18 | 19% |
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 33% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#312,705
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#130
of 4,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,392
of 325,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.