↓ Skip to main content

Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003046.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Weis, Annegret Franke, Joachim Mössner, Janus C Jakobsen, Konrad Schoppmeyer

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Percutaneous interventional therapies, such as radiofrequency (thermal) ablation (RFA), have been developed for early hepatocellular carcinoma. RFA competes with other interventional techniques such as percutaneous ethanol injection, surgical resection, and liver transplantation. The potential benefits and harms of RFA compared with placebo, no intervention, chemotherapy, hepatic resection, liver transplantation, or other interventions are unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 262 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 73 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Psychology 12 5%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 82 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,262
of 320,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.