↓ Skip to main content

Sequencing the genome of the Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus) as a model for studying extreme adaptations in snakes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequencing the genome of the Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus) as a model for studying extreme adaptations in snakes
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2011
DOI 10.1186/gb-2011-12-7-406
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todd A Castoe, AP Jason de Koning, Kathryn T Hall, Ken D Yokoyama, Wanjun Gu, Eric N Smith, Cédric Feschotte, Peter Uetz, David A Ray, Jason Dobry, Robert Bogden, Stephen P Mackessy, Anne M Bronikowski, Wesley C Warren, Stephen M Secor, David D Pollock

Abstract

The Consortium for Snake Genomics is in the process of sequencing the genome and creating transcriptomic resources for the Burmese python. Here, we describe how this will be done, what analyses this work will include, and provide a timeline.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 150 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 12 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,178,101
of 16,028,091 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,191
of 3,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,598
of 92,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,028,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.