You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An electroconvulsive therapy procedure impairs reconsolidation of episodic memories in humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nn.3609 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marijn C W Kroes, Indira Tendolkar, Guido A van Wingen, Jeroen A van Waarde, Bryan A Strange, Guillén Fernández |
| Abstract |
Despite accumulating evidence for a reconsolidation process in animals, support in humans, especially for episodic memory, is limited. Using a within-subjects manipulation, we found that a single application of electroconvulsive therapy following memory reactivation in patients with unipolar depression disrupted reactivated, but not non-reactivated, memories for an emotional episode in a time-dependent manner. Our results provide evidence for reconsolidation of emotional episodic memories in humans. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 18% |
| France | 5 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 59% |
| Scientists | 14 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 344 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 23% |
| Researcher | 57 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 121 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 68 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 12% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 60 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 308. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#112,391
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#170
of 5,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#950
of 322,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#4
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.