↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin A and fish oils for retinitis pigmentosa

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin A and fish oils for retinitis pigmentosa
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008428.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sobharani Rayapudi, Stephen G Schwartz, Xue Wang, Pamela Chavis

Abstract

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) comprises a group of hereditary eye diseases characterized by progressive degeneration of retinal photoreceptors. It results in severe visual loss that may lead to legal blindness. Symptoms may become manifest during childhood or adulthood, and include poor night vision (nyctalopia) and constriction of peripheral vision (visual field loss). This field loss is progressive and usually does not reduce central vision until late in the disease course.The worldwide prevalence of RP is one in 4000, with 100,000 patients affected in the USA. At this time, there is no proven therapy for RP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 19%
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 22 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,213,615
of 13,868,365 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,568
of 10,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,508
of 255,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,868,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.