You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial of the effects of antithrombin on disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satoshi Gando, Daizoh Saitoh, Hiroyasu Ishikura, Masashi Ueyama, Yasuhiro Otomo, Shigeto Oda, Shigeki Kushimoto, Katsuhisa Tanjoh, Toshihiko Mayumi, Toshiaki Ikeda, Toshiaki Iba, Yutaka Eguchi, Kohji Okamoto, Hiroshi Ogura, Kazuhide Koseki, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Takayama, Kunihiro Shirai, Osamu Takasu, Yoshiaki Inoue, Kunihiro Mashiko, Takaya Tsubota, Shigeatsu Endo, Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (JAAM DIC) Study Group for the JAAM DIC Antithrombin Trial (JAAMDICAT) |
| Abstract |
To test the hypothesis that the administration of antithrombin concentrate improves disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), resulting in recovery from DIC and better outcomes in patients with sepsis, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled multicenter trial at 13 critical care centers in tertiary care hospitals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Oman | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,091,226
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,970
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,250
of 321,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#57
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.