↓ Skip to main content

Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn Stacey, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Jeff Belkora, B Joyce Davison, Marie-Anne Durand, Karen B Eden, Aubri S Hoffman, Mirjam Koerner, France Légaré, Marie-Chantal Loiselle, Richard L Street

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 190 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 56 29%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Psychology 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 49 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,697,501
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#730
of 2,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,731
of 319,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#23
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.