↓ Skip to main content

A targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events in surgical patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events in surgical patients
Published in
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/jep.12033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boer, Monica, Kiewiet, Jordy J. S., Boeker, Eveline B., Ramrattan, Maya A., Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W., Lie‐A‐Huen, Loraine, Boermeester, Marja A.

Abstract

This study demonstrates the development, reliability and outcome of a targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events (ADEs) in surgical patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 65%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Unspecified 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2013.
All research outputs
#4,687,182
of 6,342,860 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#291
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,649
of 148,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,342,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.