↓ Skip to main content

Asia’s glaciers are a regionally important buffer against drought

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
185 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Asia’s glaciers are a regionally important buffer against drought
Published in
Nature, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature22062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamish D. Pritchard

Abstract

The high mountains of Asia-encompassing the Himalayas, the Hindu Kush, Karakoram, Pamir Alai, Kunlun Shan, and Tian Shan mountains-have the highest concentration of glaciers globally, and 800 million people depend in part on meltwater from them. Water stress makes this region vulnerable economically and socially to drought, but glaciers are a uniquely drought-resilient source of water. Here I show that these glaciers provide summer meltwater to rivers and aquifers that is sufficient for the basic needs of 136 million people, or most of the annual municipal and industrial needs of Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. During drought summers, meltwater dominates water inputs to the upper Indus and Aral river basins. Uncertainties in mountain precipitation are poorly known, but, given the magnitude of this water supply, predicted glacier loss would add considerably to drought-related water stress. Such additional water stress increases the risk of social instability, conflict and sudden, uncontrolled population migrations triggered by water scarcity, which is already associated with the large and rapidly growing populations and hydro-economies of these basins.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 32%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Unspecified 10 6%
Other 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 69 45%
Environmental Science 36 23%
Unspecified 21 14%
Engineering 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 207. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#56,279
of 12,648,610 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,086
of 65,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,812
of 260,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#235
of 732 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,648,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 732 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.