↓ Skip to main content

Haemodialysis duration, frequency and intensity for end-stage kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Haemodialysis duration, frequency and intensity for end-stage kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010064
Authors

Bin Zhu, Min Jun, Meg J Jardine, Yong Jun Wang, Vlado Perkovic

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Engineering 4 22%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Psychology 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,069,224
of 13,589,098 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,068
of 10,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,284
of 263,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,589,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.