@gorlando5 @realdanolaspada @RealCandaceO study is good. controls for environment: water, food, etc., and animals with UV'd air didn't get sick, those w/unprocessed air did. maybe that wasn't the best link (study is from the 50s, so not many good/free sour
RT @jmcrookston: How about airplane cabins? Turns out, there's a model for that. https://t.co/wVYgE7ysCV (2 rows bc of droplets is nonse…
How about airplane cabins? Turns out, there's a model for that. https://t.co/wVYgE7ysCV (2 rows bc of droplets is nonsense btw) https://t.co/hA5eEyMVAJ
@blanc0981 @_akiraendo @kenmomd ref.18は残念ながら非open access。実測も計算もキャビン内で還流し、737だとaisleから窓側へ流れる。 感染確率を計算した座席図はfree accessでも概略は分かり、オレンジ色が感染源で白い席が確率1に近い。Wells-Rileyなので、感染確率は粒子数に線形ではありません。（続 https://t.co/tSfuIhfgfR